Recomendaciones para el análisis de datos acumulados de susceptibilidad antimicrobiana en instituciones de salud / Recommendations for the analysis of cumulated data in antimicrobial susceptibility in health institutions

Due to the great variability in antimicrobial resistance patterns, local reports of cumulative antimicrobial susceptibility data are necessary in every health center. The purpose is to guide clinical decisions and the early detection of patterns that allow preventive measures to avoid dissemination of resistant strains. The main objective of this guide is to provide recommendations for the analysis of antimicrobial susceptibility data and elaboration of a local report. Recommendations provided in this guide are based on the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) document "Analysis and Presentation of Cumulative Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Data" (3). Key aspects related to information gathering and data processing, analysis and presentation are described.

Considerando la gran variabilidad en la distribución de la resistencia microbiana, es una necesidad que cada centro de salud genere reportes locales de datos acumulados de susceptibilidad, con el propósito de guiar las decisiones clínicas y detectar tendencias que permitan establecer medidas de prevención para evitar la diseminación de cepas resistentes. Esta guía tiene como objetivo entregar recomendaciones para el análisis de susceptibilidad antimicrobiana y aportar datos útiles para la elaboración del informe local. Las recomendaciones que contenidas em este documento están basadas en el documento "Analysis and Presentation of Cumulative Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Data de Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (3). Se describen aspectos claves relacionados con los requerimientos de la información, el procesamiento de los datos, el análisis y presentación de éstos.

[Multicenter study on the monitoring of in vitro susceptibility to tigeeyeline in Santiago, Chile]. / Estudio multicéntrico de la vigilancia de la susceptibilidad in vitro a tigeciclina en Santiago de Chile.

The objective of this multicenter study was to determine tigecycline susceptibility rates, measured by agar diffusion, in nine hospitals in Santiago and to compare these rates with other antimicrobials. Each center studied 20 strains per month. All intermediate and fully resistant strains as well as 10% of susceptibile strains were also studied by the broth microdilution method. Overall, 2301 strains were studied displaying the following susceptibility rates for tigecycline: 100% for Streptococcus sp, Enterococcus sp, and E. coli respectively, 99.8% for Staphylococcus sp, 93% for Klebsiella and 80% for Acinetobacter baumarmii. For Proteus, Providencia and Morganella the susceptibility rates were 4%. For cefotaxime-resistant Klebsiella and imipenem-resistant A. baumarmii susceptibility rates were 95% and 80% respectively. The agar diffusion and broth dilution method were 100% concordant for tigecycline susceptible strains but only 27% for resistant or intermediate strains represented mostly by Acinetobacter baumannii. The majority of these strains (57/59) proved to be susceptible after retesting. The great majority (96,6%) of strains tested from nine Chilean hospitals proved to be susceptible to tigecycline with exception for Proteus, Providencia and Morganella (66% resistance). Using the agar diffusion method for measuring tigecycline susceptibility to A. baumannii may be misleading.

Estudio multicéntrico de la vigilancia de la susceptibilidad in vitro a tigeciclina en Santiago de Chile / Multicenter study on the monitoring of in vitro susceptibility to tigeeyeline in Santiago, Chile

The objective of this multicenter study was to determine tigeeyeline susceptibility rates, measured by agar diffusion, in nine hospitals in Santiago and to compare these rates with other antimicrobials. Each center studied 20 strains per month. All intermedíate and fully resistant strains as well as 10 percent of susceptibile strains were also studied by the broth microdilution method. Overall, 2301 strains were studied displaying the foliowing susceptibility rates for tigeeyeline: 100 percent for Streptococcus sp, Enterococcus sp, and E. coli respectively, 99.8 percent for Staphylococcus sp, 93 percent for Klebsiella and 80 percent for Acinetobacter baumarmii. For Proteus, Providencia and Morganella the susceptibility rates were 4 percent. For cefotaxime-resistant Klebsiella and imipenem-resistant A. baumarmii susceptibility rates were 95 percent and 80 percent respectively. The agar diffusion and broth dilution method were 100 percent concordant for tigeeyeline susceptible strains but only 27 percent for resistant or intermedíate strains represented mostly by Acinetobacter baumannii. The majority of these strains (57/59) proved to be susceptible after retesting. The great majority (96,6 percent) of strains tested from nine Chilean hospitals proved to be susceptible to tigeeyeline with exception for Proteus, Providencia and Morganella (66 percent resistance). Using the agar diffusion method for measuring tigeeyeline susceptibility to A. baumannii may be misleading.

Para conocer la susceptibilidad a tigeciclina por difusión en agar en nueve hospitales de Santiago y comparar la susceptibilidad con otros antimicrobianos, se diseñó este estudio multicéntrico. Cada centro estudió 20 cepas mensualmente. Las intermedias, resistentes y 10 por cientoo de las susceptibles se re-testearon y estudiaron por microdilución en caldo. Se incluyeron 2.304 cepas. Fueron susceptibles a tigeciclina Strep-tococcus sp (100 por cientoo), Enterococcus sp (100 por ciento), E. coli (100 por cientoo), Staphylococcus sp (99,8 por ciento), Klebsiella pneumoniae (93 por ciento) y Acinetobacter baumannii (80 por ciento). En Proteus, Providencia y Morganella la susceptibilidad fue 4 por cientoo. Klebsiella resistente a cefotaxima y Acinetobacter resistente a imipenem, 95 por cientoo y 80 por cientoo fueron susceptibles a tigeciclina, respectivamente. La concordancia en cepas susceptibles y en las enviadas como resistentes o intermedias (A. baumannii) fue 100 por cientoo y 27 por cientoo respectivamente. El re-testeo confirmó que la mayoría eran susceptibles. Los patrones de susceptibilidad bacteriana muestran muy buena actividad in vitro a tigeciclina. La resistencia in vitro de A. baumannii por difusión en agar debe interpretarse con precaución.